The June jobs report delivered a pretty nasty miss, with just 57,000 new hires against expectations for 100,000.
But here’s the wrinkle: the unemployment rate actually fell, giving traders two seemingly conflicting signals from the very same report.
There’s a reason for that, and with the next jobs report due today at 12:30 p.m. GMT, the same dynamic could come into play again.
In today’s U.S. July NFP report, scheduled at 12:30 pm GMT, that same architecture is back on the table.
Most traders will watch one number. Here’s why that isn’t enough.
Why does the jobs report contain two separate job counts?
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) doesn’t run one survey. It runs two simultaneously, and they count different populations.
The Establishment Survey contacts roughly 119,000 businesses and government agencies and counts jobs listed on payrolls. This is where the nonfarm payrolls (NFP) headline comes from. A worker holding two part-time jobs shows up as two separate jobs in this count.
The Household Survey contacts around 60,000 individual households directly and asks each person whether they’re employed. That same two-job worker counts as one employed person. A self-employed consultant who pays no payroll taxes appears in the Household Survey but not in the Establishment Survey at all.
So, we’re looking at the same economy and the same release time, but two very different ways of counting employment.
This structural gap is why the initial dollar move after the release sometimes reverses in the first few minutes. Algorithms tend to jump on the headline number first, while human traders take a little longer to dig through the rest of the report and figure out whether the details tell the same story.
Why did the unemployment rate fall in June even though hiring slowed?
The answer comes down to how the unemployment rate is calculated.
When people stop actively looking for work — because they’re discouraged, retired early, or waiting for conditions to improve — they exit the labor force entirely. At that point, the BLS no longer counts them as unemployed because they’re no longer actively seeking a job.
That’s where labor force participation comes in. It measures the share of the working-age population that is either employed or actively looking for work. When participation falls, fewer people are included in the unemployment calculation, which means the unemployment rate can decline even during a month when hiring is weak.
June’s unemployment rate fell from 4.3% to 4.2% not because the labor market strengthened, but because participation fell at the same time the payrolls count missed.
In other words, the lower unemployment rate didn’t necessarily signal a stronger labor market. The Household Survey and Establishment Survey were simply telling different parts of the story.
Which story you trusted determined how you framed the Fed’s September options.
Promoted: Fast markets are stressful enough without worrying about account security.
When NFP hits and volatility spikes, the last thing you need is to fumble through reused passwords for your broker, charting tools, or trading accounts. LastPass can generate and securely store strong passwords so your logins stay organized while you focus on the data.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission from our partners if you sign up through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Why wages may matter more than payrolls this time
Under normal conditions, the payrolls headline drives the dollar. More jobs means stronger growth means higher rate expectations means stronger currency.
But this isn’t a normal setup.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh scrapped forward guidance at the Fed’s July 29 meeting, leaving markets with no clear policy path to lean on. That means each major data release now carries more weight in shaping expectations for what the Fed does next.
Fed Governor Lisa Cook added to that tension on Wednesday, saying she currently sees more risk to the inflation mandate than the employment mandate and is “prepared to act” if disinflation stalls. Three voting members had already pushed for a rate hike at the July meeting.
Against that backdrop, traders may care just as much about what workers are being paid as how many new jobs are being created.
Average hourly earnings (AHE) tracks changes in workers’ hourly pay and gives markets one of the clearest monthly reads on wage pressure. The consensus for July is 0.3% m/m, but a print of 0.4% or higher could strengthen the hawkish case by suggesting wage growth remains firm enough to keep inflation pressure alive, even if hiring itself continues to cool.
That’s why a payrolls beat of 90,000 paired with 0.2% AHE would tell a very different story from a 60,000 payrolls miss paired with 0.4% AHE.
Right now, the Fed story may run less through headcounts and more through wages.
What do today’s leading indicators suggest about the July print?
The signals heading into the 12:30 p.m. GMT release lean soft, though not decisively so.
ADP reported just 44,000 private-sector jobs for July, less than half its 90,000 forecast. ISM services employment fell to 47.4, below 50 and into contraction territory. Services generate the majority of U.S. private payroll growth, so that subindex matters more than its size might suggest. Manufacturing employment beat estimates, but it’s a smaller slice of the total.Against those signals, some analysts now estimate the effective bar for a genuine headline beat sits closer to 50,000 than the published 79,000 consensus.
When the numbers hit, it makes sense to read them in order. Start with payrolls against 79,000, then check AHE against 0.3%, unemployment against 4.2%, and finally whether June’s already soft 57,000 gain gets revised. A sizable downward revision could weaken the underlying trend just as much as a disappointing July headline.
If payrolls, wages, and unemployment all point in the same direction, the dollar’s initial move has a better chance of sticking. If the details conflict, say a headline beat alongside soft wages and a higher unemployment rate, traders may quickly unwind part of that first reaction.
Fed Governor Thomas Barkin speaks at 2:00 p.m. GMT, giving markets another chance to hear how policymakers interpret the full report. His comments on wages, employment, and inflation could ultimately tell us more about the Fed’s reaction function than the first few minutes of price action.
Quick Takeaways
- The jobs report draws on two surveys: the Establishment Survey produces the payrolls headline, the Household Survey produces the unemployment rate — they measure different populations and regularly produce different signals
- The unemployment rate can fall in a weak hiring month if labor force participation drops at the same time — this is the mechanic behind June’s divergent print
- With forward guidance gone and three dissents on record, average hourly earnings is the component most directly tied to the Fed’s current inflation mandate focus
- Today’s leading indicators (ADP miss, ISM services employment below 50) suggest the effective breakeven for a genuine beat may sit well below the 79,000 consensus
- Read all three components together; the sustained move typically follows once the full picture loads
Watch For
- 12:30 pm GMT: U.S. jobs report. Watch AHE relative to 0.3% and whether June’s 57,000 was revised.
- 12:30 pm GMT: Canada releases its own jobs report, adding a separate volatility layer for CAD.
- 2:00 pm GMT: Fed’s Barkin speaks.
Today’s jobs report has three separate consensus figures, and the dollar’s direction will depend on which ones deviate and by how much. Premium members can read our lesson:
📖 Market Expectations: Why Good News Can Tank a Currency
Reading this helps you understand why currencies move on deviation from expectations, how to read payrolls, wages, and unemployment against their respective consensus figures, and why a headline beat or miss does not always mean what it appears to.
And if you’re not a Premium subscriber yet, now’s a good time to sign up.
With Babypips Premium, you get full access to School of Pipsology lessons that help you understand not just what the NFP number says, but why the gap between the actual print and what the market expected is what actually moves the dollar.
